Welcome to the Darling Club.

How it all began… "Papa Darling", Bob Danielak says…

I ran across a few of these tubes cheap in a surplus store. After looking up the characteristics, i thought i’d only be able to make a line-stage out of them.

Sat on the shelf for a while.

Later, i built an SE 12V6 (pentode) amplifier using 12SJ7 pentode driver. It sounded ok, but sounded much better when the 12V6 was triode connected. this amp put out <1W, but was suprisingly loud.

Then i remembered that the 1626 also used a 12.6V filament, and that its pin-out was identical to the 12V6 (except it had no screen). So i simply plugged it in to the 12V6 amp.

And the rest is history…

IMPORTANT

I’m sorry I have not been able to diligently update this page. You could join the Club directly now!

Join the Darling Club!

The Darling…

Read Bob’s original Sound Practice Darling article here. Thanks to Joe Roberts!

Read Jeremy Epstein‘s wonderfully written Darling Fest’99.

The Darling was featured in

Schematics… You can find them at Bob Danielak’s. Please check out the various Darling Club members’ webpages too.

The version I built is modified by Shamsul Bahrin from Malaysia.

Free Lunch Darling by Papa Darling himself!

Check out my Experimental Darling page as well…

Matrix Darling!

More than out of this world… "My Darling is not a Monkey!"

Datasheets of 1626, 8532(6J4), and 5965(12AV7).

Update: April 2006 NEW!   
Darling iron sets now available!

Darling Club…

Bob "Papa Darling" Danielak, USA

Jeremy Epstein’s DC Darling, Brooklyn, New York, USA

Gary Kaufman’s DC Darling, Boston, Massachussetts, USA

Tim Reese’s Double Darling, Boston, Massachussetts, USA

LD Moore’s Scrap Box DC Darling

Dion’s 1626SE Project, Suffolk County, Long Island, New York, USA.

Tom Scoville’s Double Darling, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA.

Ed Faulkner’s Single Darling, Moscow, Idaho, USA.

Steven’s Sakuma Darling, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Arnaud Michotte’s Darling, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Aren van Waarde’s Double Darling, Zuidhorn, Netherlands.

Doug Forbes’ Standing Darling, La Crescenta, California, USA.

Shamsul Bahrin, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.

Kenneth Lau, Sandakan, Malaysia.

Timo’s MONSTER Darling, Bremen, Germany.
No kidding. On the left is the power supply while signal circuitry is on the right.

Yours truly! Naked Darling, Yeo, Penang, Malaysia.

Brian Wickman’s Stereo Darling, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Ed Fausto’s Stereo Darling, Manila, Philippines

Gabriel Voon’s Double Darling, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Kyle Kuroda’s DC Double Darling, Mililani, Hawaii, US.

Constantine Constas Darling, Athens, Greece.

Tom Laskowski’s DC Darling, Waterloo, Canada.

Vaughn Wright’s Darling, Los Angeles, California.

John Woldstad’s DC Double Darling, Renton, WA.

Paul Butterfield Audio’s DadaDarling. Love the mercury rectifier, love the artiness, love the duck!

Carsten’s SE Darling. Note the 300B is now a paper weight… Germany.

Erik "Dr Exotica on Audio Asylum" Hoel’s Darling Amp, Redlands, California, USA.

Johannes Lebong’s 5691 driver Darling amp, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Paul Radovan’s Darling, Brisbane, Australia.

Song Heng’s Darling, Singapore

CG Ew’s Darling, Batu Pahat, Malaysia

Johannes Lebong’s Ultra Fi Darling, Germany

Alexander Kriegel’s Darling, Germany

abraxasaudio’s Darling amp project, USA.

Wilson Santiago’s Darling, Hammond, Indiana, USA. Built from a cigar box!

Philip Barrett’s Little Darling, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Tom McNally’s Darling, Atlantic City, NJ, USA.
NEW!

The post darling club appeared first on diyparadise.

Experimenter 1626 

The inspiration came from Matthew Reidsma’s Experimenter
45. 

Now here comes my part. 

I want to do the same as Matthew, using the 1626
in the same configuration. However, there were a few problems.

Of all the best laid plans of men and
mice…

Initial plan was to discard the 5842 and use a
5965 in its place. I built a 5965-1626  Darling before. Read the Darling
Club page. The 5965 has too high a plate resistance here (6-7kohm), so was
discarded. Then an idea came to use the lot of 5687s which I have acquired quite
a number of. Too bad their mu of 18 isn’t high enough. Unless, of course, I use
a preamp. Never mind… So, back to the 5842.

And then, I realize I can’t bias the 1626 at -45V.
I want to bias it at -25V ala the original Darling. After all, it sounds so
sweet at that point, so why tinker a winning formula?

If I bias it at -25V, that means I have only 25V
drop across the 5842 plate resistor.  Now here lies the problem. I can’t
use the 4.7kohm resistor if I want to use the 10mA through the 5842. I have to
go down to the region of ~2kohm. Not a good idea as you want to load the 5842
plate at least twice the plate resistance of 1-2kohm. I can still use the
4.7kohm if I let 5mA flow through the 5842. It’ll work but the 5842 prefers
higher current! As you can see, I’m stuck here, more current, not enough plate
resistance; enough plate resistance, not enough current… Oh my….

Help!

I wrote to Matthew and one of his recommendations
was to use a 6922 or 6DJ8. Looking at the tube data, it could actually work at
5mA/4.7k but I don’t want to spend more $$ on tubes. Hmm…

One day, while discussing my predicament with tube
buddy YH, he said “why not use a current source?” 

That’s right! This
will solve all my problems. The current source will provide an AC impedance of
tens of kilo ohms and I can use a variable resistor to find the correct
resistance to drop off the desired 25V. So this should replace the 4.7k.

Cool… Now what? I could use the C4S or some
other constant current source but purists might balk at seeing silicon in the
circuit. What? Listen to sand? 

Let the hemoglobin flow!

Okay, okay… more thinking and then it dawned on
me that a choke is the answer! Yes, iron!

 [By now you should realize how dumb I
have been. All the stuff presented here has been done by others before me. They
have evolved beyond homo sapiens and I’m still Neanderthal…]

I looked through the Hammond catalog and was
grinning ear to ear when I saw the specs of the 154E. 

Do you see that? If I run the 5842 at 15mA, then
15mA*1666ohms is… 25V! Yes! That’s all to it! The choke drops the desired 25V
while still presenting a high impedance to the 5842. 

At 20Hz, Z = 2*pi*f*L + DCR = 2*3.14*20*20 + 1666
= 4178 ohms

Good enough right? 

*Note that you need to use a 1.3-1.5V battery to
get the 15mA.

The Hammond 125E output transformer should be 5.6k or higher. You can take this further by replacing the input
100kohm resistor with an input transformer and you now have a “No R, No C
amp”! 

Alternatives

Okay, now that the above is done, what else can we
do? 

Perhaps I want to present a higher plate impedance
to the 5842. I could use the Hammond 157G which is 30H and has a DCR of 595
ohms. I will need a resistance of 1kohm in series to reach that magic number of
25 again. Better still, I can bias the 5842 at different currents and place a
suitable resistor there.

Or perhaps I want to parafeed the output? Use a
Hammond 157G as plate choke?

*Handmade Electronics has some hefty chokes with
60H inductance. You can definitely use them in place of the Hammond 157G. Or any
choke for the matter, as long as it could withstand 25mA of DC current through
it.

I haven’t (and don’t know how) calculated the
capacitor value there but I guess a 5uF will work. 

There you have it! Experimental 1626 or
Experimental Darling!  Simple right?

Now how does it sound?

I’m embarrassed to say that I haven’t built this
amp yet. *blush*blush* I have almost everything here except those Hammond chokes. Shipping
from US is too expensive for the chokes.

*Please note that all iron above were chosen for
cost factor ONLY. Any other equivalent exotic make will work.

diyparadise.com

The post Experimenter 1626 appeared first on diyparadise.

My experience with ‘Sakuma Darling’

I have heard a lot about the Sakuma Darling and
was eager to try it out. For the uninitiated, Sakuma San is a cool Japanese guy
whose amp philosophy is without peer. He believes in

• like drives like. If you like the sound of a
  300B, then use a 300B as driver. If you stick a 12AX7 in front, then you are
  no longer listening to the sound of a 300B.
• iron and lots of iron. Sakuma San believes in
  transformer coupling. Also, for 300B to drive 300B, you first need lots of
  voltage swing. This is where step-up interstage comes in. Unfortunately,
  interstage trans are REALLY expensive.
• mono is cool. Yeah, Sakuma San listens only in mono…

I can’t afford a 300B, lest a 300B driving another
300B. Nor can I afford those Tamuras Sakuma San uses, so the Sakuma Darling will have to do. I
hope it brings light on the Sakuma sound.

The above circuit is modified from Bob Danielak’s
Sakuma Darling. The cheap interstage transformers make it interesting and
affordable. Since make-or-break depends on the trans, they warrant a closer
look. Look here for my experiments with the AES 10k:90k
PT159 interstage. You’ll understand why there is a 47k on the secondary of
the PT159.

I spent some time testing the Allied 10k:10k
interstage as well. Unfortunately, it’s not as great as the AES interstage. In
fact, it SUCKS. With or without DC current flowing through it, it SUCKS.
There seems to be 2 peaks in the frequency response. A mild 6dB peak at ~30kHz
and a horrendous 12dB peak at ~55kHz. Worse thing is, there’s nothing much I
could do about it. Low frequency response isn’t great either. The spec says down
to 150Hz and you don’t have to doubt this. By the way, the interstage looks like
it’s made by Hammond. The box, the build and the labelling looks too similar to
Hammond. To improve the bass, the above schematics has a 30H choke in series
with the primary.

Anyway, I built it and… There’s really nothing
much on the lows. I don’t expect a lot of bass but it’s so rolled off that it
even struggles with some lower acoustic guitar notes. It does sound a lot more
transparent than the conventional Darling. it took out the fun and isn’t very
fun listening to.

A search on Audio Asylum suggests bridging a
0.22uF cap between primary and secondary of the Allied interstage. Said to
improve the frequency response from DC to light, but hey, this isn’t transformer
coupling anymore! Might as well take out the interstage and leave the cap there!
That’s what I did. I took out the weak link, the Allied and reverted to
capacitor coupling.

Now we have all the bass back! It’s still pretty
transparent but you could definitely change the sound with your choice of
coupling capacitor. I used Auricap here as it’s more neutral sounding. Image
sizes are a hell lot more realistic, more lifelike but it still retains its
ability to “boogie”. Unfortunately, gain is not that great. The 5965-1626 Darling has a gain of about
36x (so direct connection from CD player works just fine) while the above only
manages <15x. A preamp will be great but the above works just fine on my
Hammer Dynamics.  

There you go, the “Not-Quite-Sakuma
Darling”! This will have to do until I could afford some REALLY serious
interstage.

The post My experience with ‘Sakuma Darling’ appeared first on diyparadise.

Power Corrupts!

When CK Kok, resident guru on DIY Den had an article on a very simple 2A3 based
single ended amplifier, I don’t have to tell you there’s this bloke here
grinning ear to ear. Like what "Tok Guru" said, once you listen to
some low-power SE magic, your life’s changed for good! You won’t go back to
anything else after that. I know the day when audiophiles appreciate the magic
of SE amps and high efficiency speakers is a long long way to fruition.  After
all, the very idea of so few watts bringing so much magic is alien to this
industry where the likes of mega-power behemoths with electrical consumption
higher than your electric kettle is hailed.  So, here let me share with you
my journey on an amplifier that consumes less energy than this PC I’m typing
on…

Like most Malaysian audiophiles, I look forward to
Thursdays as every Thursday is The Star’s Audiofile day. That particular fateful
day is when Audiofile had an article focusing on DIYers. Hmm… the idea
appealed greatly to me. If gears are expensive, why not build one yourself?
Sounds good. Also, if I could pull this off, this will be one MASSIVE boost to
my ego. Hee hee hee… Also, that particular article led to me this mailing
list, Kuala Lumpur Audio NutS. 

A few correspondence on KLANS later got me REALLY
serious into considering DIY. Credit goes to that bloke with a tube nickname…
You know who I’m talking about! 

Aha! Time to brush up my electronics! But my
affinity of falling asleep when holding a
telephone-directory-sized-mashed-tree-pulp didn’t bring much progress.
Fortunately, for my generation, there is the great World Wide Web and off I go!
I found a really wonderful site, Nelson Pass’ http://www.passlabs.com
that explains electronics very beautifully to me. Nelson Pass not only has a
gift in electronics, he has also the talent of bringing "life" into
the very dry subject of electronics.

Another benefit of Pass’ website is the various
DIY projects there. Particularly interesting is his 10W Zen amp. Now Nelson
Pass is a serious proponent of class A and I can’t agree more with him. Class A
is most linear with least noise though a lot less efficient, which thankfully, homebuilders
can get away with. Anyway, this got me itching towards
building my own Zen amp. Hey, with tag lines like "Less is more", can
you out-Zen Nelson Pass?

This point in time, I was dead set on Class A and
MOSFETs seem to marry the convenience of solid state and sonic quality of tubes.
However, one day on the KLANS mailing
list this guy, Shamsul Bahrin, was waxing lyrical non-stop about his 0.7W
Darling amp. What? 0.7W? Are you kidding? Is this even enough to swat flies? I
then realized this guy must be serious when he’s putting aside expensive makes like
Jolida and Rogers to listen to his Darling. Hmm… the fact that tubes are
much sexier to look at is another plus. Hence a few e-mails to Shamsul later and
I finally found ‘Papa Darling’ — Bob Danielak. 

Legend has it that Bob built an average-sounding amp
but stumbled across some cute looking tubes in a surplus store one day. He tried
them in this amp and the sound impressed him greatly! After optimizing the
circuit, he gave it freely on his website to anyone crazy enough to go a gaga
over 0.7W. One of these guys is Rick Francis who’s used to building huge mammoth
sized amps, so when one day he built the still-unnamed-tiny-amp, Rick’s wife
took a liking to it and said "what a darling". And there you have it!
The Darling!

It’s easy to see the popularity of the Darling.
First, the choice of output tube, the 1626 which is an unknown in the audio
world. It’s actually a RF oscillator and the curves don’t look good on paper at
all but it is Bob’s ingenuity to operate this tube at a region where it works
best for audio. Kudos to Bob. Secondly, the 1626 is a very cheap tube. Thanks to
it’s non-audio pedigree, these tubes are available at next to nothing. How about
USD3 per tube? (The 1626 is a victim of its own success,  it’s hard to get
them at USD3 these days.) And this is NOS Sylvania, RCA, Tung-sol, Ken-rad, Hytron…
Compare this with a pair of Western Electric 300B that cost 300 times more expensive and it’s easy to
see why it’s popular. Oh yeah, plus Bob utilizes cheap components in the
Darling. Any half-baked designer can take some boutique parts and assemble into
a good sounding amp but it takes talent and vision of a genius to do some with
cheap parts. The output transformer is a Hammond 125SE that puts out a sound that
belies its cost. How much to build a Darling? How about less than USD300? Since
it’s "cheap and good", we got a winner here.

Thirdly, another DIYer, Gary Kaufman, organized
mega sales of the 1626. He cut deals with surplus stores and shipped literally
hundreds of these "poor man’s 300B" to many crazy DIYers.

Which brings to this DIYer-wannabe. After visiting
Bob’s website, I longed to listen to the Darling in action but Shamsul stays too
far away in Kota Kinabalu. Well? What choice do I have? Build one!

I began to acquire all the parts I need. As a
total greenhorn, I really paid more than I had to on lots of components. Next
came the most laborious part – planning. My dad always tell me "when you
fail to plan, you plan to fail". Plus the fact that I’m going to deal with
260VDC here makes the above words more pertinent… After consulting some tube
gurus on the layout, I began to build.

Utilizing some bench drills at the workplace, I
had a steel plate cut and drilled but it was really more work than necessary.
Stupid me chose stainless steel and this thing is really tough! I got some help
along the way but only realized how hard stainless steel is when I had to do
some filing myself. You see, octal sockets to fit the 1626 is 27mm in diameter
while the biggest drill bit available to me was a 26mm. Filing off this 1mm took
me one whole hour! (I wonder how tough is "buns of steel"?)

A couple of late nights later, I finally got it
assembled. The thought of while the rest of the population drifts off to
Dreamland, and I’m creating magic, makes me
feel good… After powering up (and running away lest it explodes and bring down
the whole neighborhood), all voltages measured okay and I was itching to play
music already! But you are not going to try on your expensive speakers right?
Where to find cheap speakers? I had an idea but I still feel bad over this…
anyway, I went ahead and ripped off my car speakers…

Pressed ‘play’ and… hooray! I have music! It’s
singing! Another Darling is born! The Gods must be smiling on me! I still
remember the exact date, 10 March 2001, that’s how momentous this has been. (to
tell the truth, a buddy had a durian bet with me to complete this amp by this
date after hearing me talk about it for 2 agonizing years.)  But something is not
right. It hums, badly but its character is there and I could swap tubes! I put
in the RCA 1626 and it sounded sweet. Hey, you folks listening to sand amps, try
to do this!

A few consultations on the Net later, I began
my mission with vengeance: to eradicate hum from mankind, once and for all.
Okay, it’s not that grandiose but the action plan is this:

1. twist tightly filament heating wires. At least
   3 knots in an inch. This cancels out, to some degree, stray magnetic flux
   from each wire.
2. grounding heater center taps or elevating it to
   some higher potential.
3. grounding the chassis.

I tried all 3 and hum is gone. I’m happy! I have
my music and it’s hum free!

So I thought… Then I hear hum again. This time
it’s more menacing. Sometimes you hear it, sometimes you don’t. Talking about
The Phantom Menance…

This bugged me for quite a while until one day
when music was playing and hum was singing, I accidentally touched the RCA
shield of my interconnect and… DEAD SILENCE. No hum at all! Huh? I found out I
haven’t grounded the chassis after all! Oh well, a simple wire and that’s it! No
more hum!

[As an aside, please be reminded that this
"one finger poke here and there" tweak is no solution to audio
problems. I had the learning experience of electrolytic capacitors discharging
its contents on my fingers not once, but TWICE. Whoever said "once bitten
twice shy" obviously haven’t met me yet.]

There you have it! My journey to ecstasy! SE
magic! 

Part 2. Romancing the Darling…

Romancing the Darling…

Alright! I now have my Darling singing but the fun of DIY has just begun…

It was not until a year later that I had my chance
to romance my Darling. You see, I now have my pair of 97dB sensitive Hammer Dynamics
Super 12 up and running! Previously, when driving a pair of 86dBs I had to
listen nearfield and to material with limited dynamic range. Now that my Hammers
are up and running, my Darling is able to flex her muscles. Oh yeah!

The sound is good, the sound is nice. Any
deficiency easily masked by the achievement so far but "itchy hand"
strikes and you are eager to find out how far you can go. But upgrading your DIY amp is different
from other audiophiles. Instead of buying/selling amps/speakers/CD players/cables etc,
you focus on the internal organs, the components.

Step by step

The first upgrade I did was change the coupling
capacitor from a local make to Auricaps. Both are of the same material,
polypropylene. Wow! If previously I could hear some echo and an overly
emphasized lower midrange. This is now gone! And I thought those were artifacts
from the Hammers. It is as though a teacher took a cane to discipline her and my
Darling behaves a lot more nicely now.

Then came the next upgrade. I took out the
Auricaps and put in the Jensen copper foil paper in foil capacitors. Now, this
is one massive cap. It’s much heavier and cost more than twice the Auricaps. Put
them in and… my goodness! The sound changed so much it’s like changing amps!
No, I’m not talking about subtle changes here but BIG MASSIVE CHANGES. Albert Au
sounded so romantic now, while warm sounding vocals like CaiQin becomes too syrupy, too thick. Huh? Looks like the Jensens work great with low husky male
vocals while the Auricaps love to gyrate with femme fatales more.

Out came the Jensen and in went the Auricaps. And
I played music for days…

But then I read that paper-in-oil capacitors need
some hours to break in and that few hours of playing the Jensens surely didn’t
do justice to it. Okay, let the Auricaps play for a week first, familiarize with
the sound first.

So I thought.

A week later, took out the Auricaps and put in the
Jensens. This time, I got the Jensens in a different orientation. Though they
don’t come with a recommended orientation, Jensens recommend experimentation as
to which orientation sounds better. This time I got the foil side connected to
the input. Played music and…

Nope. It was totally different from the previous
experience. The Jensens don’t sound so thick like before but what’s amazing is,
you hear more treble and bass takes more definition. What’s better is, the
critical midrange is smoothened out somewhat. Great stuff here! Albert Au doesn’t
sound so romantic like before while CaiQin is a hell lot more listenable than
before. This
is more like it! More hours of playing later and this character remained
unchanged. Great!

However, please bear in mind that this in no way
endorses the Jensens over the Auricaps. Each system will work with each
component. I know of guys whose Auricap worked best while some found Jensens
better. The keyword here is EXPERIMENT. Also, in a single ended amp, with so few
components, parts quality is downright critical. A change of ONE cap is enough
to make you go bonkers. The difference is night and day! As such, use these caps
like how you would like spices. A dash here and there to impart its sonic
flavour. 

The next step I did was to put back the cathode
bypass capacitor. You see, when I encountered a problem with the Darling
earlier, silly me clipped off the leads of this cap too much. As a result, I
couldn’t use it anymore. Now that I bought some new caps, better fit them
in. And the sound…

Much louder!  All this while, without that
cathode bypass cap, input headroom was compromised. Piano edges, transients
became distorted. With this cap in, the Darling is playing more like a 0.7W.
Previously, I must have been listening at something like 0.4W! Also, with this cap, I
gained more bass, and smoother midrange as well. This is too good! By the way,
this is the great value Elna Starget. A change later to Elna Cerafine, I didn’t
hear THAT much improvement.

Detour

As I enjoy myself with this journey so far, I
begin to ask this question. What is the reference? Sure, a change of caps here
and there changed the sound but is the change for better or for worse? How do
you know? I mean, I used Norah Jones many times as a reference for my changes but
how do I know I’m attaining the right sound? How do I know her voice is
supposed to be like the way it’s playing in my system? Listening on a different set, that
sound is a combination of her vocals, her
music IN THAT SYSTEM. No matter how transparent your system is (if this is your
goal) your system still imbues its character to the music you are listening
to. 

So is Norah Jones’ voice raw and edgy? Sweet and
sultry? How do I
know? Of course the ideal way would be to kidnap her and get her to sing for you
IN YOUR ROOM, then voice your amp, your system accordingly to best approach her
voice IN YOUR ROOM but, sadly, this is not a practical option. (If only I have
my way…) I heard the designer of Harbeth speakers did exactly this. No, not with Norah Jones but with
his daughter’s voice.

So what does this leave us DIYers? Our frame of
reference is still an interpretation. Well, after thinking for a while, maybe I
should change my approach. Instead of voicing my system to be transparent
sounding, why not voice it to give you the most musical ecstasy? To the point
that the very vocals are still distinct and has its own character, whatever this
frame of reference can be. I mean, Diana Krall should sound a lot different from
Norah Jones, should sound a lot different from CaiQin and so on…  Oh
well…

Back to itchy hands!

The journey continues! Then I got myself some
power supply chokes. You see, my current power supply is a capacitor-resistor-capacitor
filter. With this choke, I can replace the resistor with it and it now becomes
capacitor-choke-capacitor. Chokes work by regulating currents and in a SE amp
where there is an appreciable amount of DC current, chokes seem like a godsend.
Okay, I took out the resistor and replaced it with a 10H 120mA choke. Played
music and…

The character changed so much I simply can’t
believe it! First, I thought I heard less volume. It doesn’t seem to play as
loud as before but more warm-up later, it’s not that I’m hearing less but that
the stage has moved backwards! Previously, when Norah Jones sings, she’s
standing just in front of you, but she’s much larger than life! Now, with the
choke, she’s moved backwards somewhat and she’s more lifelike in scale! The
stage begins at the speaker face and extends backwards. Wow! Also, if you listen
carefully, bass does go deeper, there’s more definition there and the sound
overall is smoother. Great stuff! Don’t tell me how a simple choke brings about
such a big change!

Few weeks passed by, then some NOS output
transformers arrived. At the moment, the Hammond 125Es, due to their 100Hz
cutoff, doesn’t allow the Hammers to flex its bass muscles. I thus bought this
pair of NOS output trans to try and see if it betters the Hammonds. Put them in
and… this is disappointing. In place of the Hammonds, the music now is dull,
dull, dull. Frequency extension is even more limited than the Hammonds. Forget
about the bass, there’s not much treble either. Looks like a bad purchase.

Oh well, this is not the end of the world.
Retaining the NOS output transformers, I added the Hammonds in as well and
rewired the whole mess so that the NOS output transformers play the role of
plate choke while the Hammond resume output transformer duties. Also, fitted
huge, massive, great-for-ego 5uF oil caps. What is all this mess, you ask? 

Well this circuit arrangement is called shunt feed, or parallel feed, or just plain parafeed. What we have now here is that a plate choke loads the output tube and allows only DC current to flow through. The oil cap blocks DC from flowing through the output trans. As such, when signal is present (AC), it’ll go through the output transformers. This means that the output trans doesn’t seem any DC flowing through it. As such it doesn’t need an air gap. This should be easier to fabricate, with better material, smaller in size… all the goodies!

Yeah, enough of techno babble. After some REALLY
messy wiring, played music and… Cowabunga! This is even better than before!
No, the character hasn’t changed much but the bass has! I get more bass
extension now. This is no more a 100Hz roll-off. It rolls off lower though at
quite a steep slope but the fact that it goes lower gives me the smiles! I love
this! Later, I then tried Ultrapath, a circuit configuration that feeds the
signal BACK to the output tube cathode but didn’t hear much difference.

Is this the end? 

Not really but I had to rebuild my
Darling as I ran out of space to for my DIY fun. This time though, I broke my own rule. I changed too many things at one
time so I really can’t tell which caused what changes. Changes are all in the
power supply section. Power supply filter is now choke input instead of
capacitor input. Power supply filter capacitance is greatly reduced. Additionally, tube rectifiers in the form of
ultra-cool TV damper diodes is now being used rather than the earlier sand
rectifiers. Now have 2 power transformers as well, one for B+ while one for
filament. Oh yeah, I took this opportunity to upgrade to a much beefier B+
trans. Used to be 60VA, now it’s 150VA when I actually only need less than
30VA… There’s lots of iron now. 2 power trans, 3 chokes, 2 huge ‘sardine
can’ oil caps… All this just for the power supply.

Signal circuitry still remains unchanged but
Auricaps were put in instead as they were of a more transparent nature, thus
easier to listen to the changes in the power supply. Built the whole thing on 2
pieces of plywood. One for the power supply (this weigh more than 10kg!) and
another much bigger piece for the signal section. 

It took only 2 days to build but a few days to
reduce all the hum. On wood chassis, it’s harder to work against hum as you
don’t have a metal chassis to ground all the hash away but all rules concerning
signal ground, earth ground and AC filaments still have to be observed. 

With all that done, there’s still an evil 1V
ripple riding on the B+. On this power supply, circuit simulation showed only
10mV but I’m seeing a lot more. So much for simulation… Anyway, tuning the
choke to 100Hz should reduce this ripple by some tenths of dB.
Though the choke is rated for 5H at 250mA and calculation shows a 0.5uF cap,
putting this cap in had almost nil difference. Huh? Well, 5H is measured AT
250mA but we now have only 70mA, so the inductance is actually higher. How much
higher? No idea but slowly paralleling the caps, adding 0.1uF at a time and
slowly bring you to the right point. 

I did exactly that and it was the toughest part of
rebuilding the Darling. Finally a capacitance of 0.74uF gave total SILENCE on my
97dB Hammers. Calculating back, the choke seems to be only 3H… So much
for measurements…

Oh yeah! Took the opportunity to wire in the
Hammond 125ESE instead of the earlier 125E. Another variable.

The sound? 

Glorious! Actually I can’t actually remember much
about my earlier Darling sound but there’s unmistakably much more BASS and the
system is pretty punchy! Bass is quick, I attribute to the low capacitance in
the power supply. JC Morrison used to say those systems touting hundreds of
microfarad always boast on its ability to release a torrent of energy at a pin
drop but no one ever says how long it takes to recover itself.

I tend to agree here. 

Imagine a few hundred micro-farad in the power
supply. Yes, the first bass note goes deep, almost exhausting all its charges
but it needs TIME to recharge itself for the next assault. This much capacitance
takes time to recharge fully. If it doesn’t fully recharge, the subsequent bass
notes suffer. 

But in a system of much lesser capacitance, the
charge and discharge cycle can be pretty quick, thus more in time with the
music. 

Anyway, this is just what I think. It’s worth
SQUAT in the grand scheme of things. Who cares as long as you are enjoying the
music? And I’m glad to say that the humble little Darling, with its 0.7W worth
of Class A SE is worth every 0.1W of them.

The post Power Corrupts! appeared first on diyparadise.

Return of the Darling

Yeah folks, all this travelling from my day job has me listening more to elevator music than my humble setup. This is NOT good.

So the idea came to build a small amp, as compact as possible, so that I can bring it around. And what better than the humble little Darling amp? It’s been almost 2 years since I dismantled the previous “super mojo” Frankensteinian version.

OK, enough nostalgia. A Darling amp at 0.7W should be tiny, compact and cute right? The above, weighing more than 15kg for the power supply alone is more “Beast” then “Darling”. So the below transpired.

However, just building another Darling amp won’t be fun right? So there’s a twist. The output stage is no conventional SE but the Matrix topology. No, not that Oracle, The One, Zion blah blah nonsense but this topology rediscovered by the venerable Steve Bench. (Thanks Steve!) Since I’m using toroidal power trans as output trans, I adapted the wiring ala Steve’s 7695 version.

With 3 pieces of toroidal iron and the cool Matrix topology, we have a very small/compact/tiny/cute/darling Darling amp!

Uncommon signal will go through the first trans. If this doesn’t make sense, well, it works exactly like a center-tapped interstage transformer.

The common mode signal will be rejected by the top trans but fed to the bottom trans and mixed back at the secondaries to the speakers. So dissimilar trans won’t work!

Unfortunately the above configuration has unbalanced DC current on the bottom trans. This is where parallel feed comes in. Steve used a ridiculously small 1.5H as parallel feed choke! But this doesn’t matter to the Matrix topology as there’s still plenty of bass. Due to size considerations, I can’t fit in a choke (look at above pics). So I fitted in a 1kohm resistor. Works just as well. I can’t fit in a big 30uF DC blocking cap too so 5.6uF it is. The output trans are actually ILP power trans with primaries of 110-0V, 110-0V and secondaries of 9-0V, 9-0V.

The background is not as pitch dark as my reference system but then I economized so much on the power supply, so this could explain it. There is some channel crosstalk. It could be due to so many reasons I haven’t even started figuring out. Look at the wiring and tell me could there be crosstalk?! I think I’ll snip the wires after I’m done with modding it.

So there you have it. This is the cheapest/smallest tube amp I have ever built. Darling in all its glory!

www.diyparadise.com

The post Return of the Darling appeared first on diyparadise.

NOT “My Darling is a Monkey!” 

This is adapted from Thosten Loesch’s Full Monkey featuring the 5842 driving a 300B.

The simplicity and use of so few components is really inviting. Very very tempted to build… Beware though, unlike most tube designs, component values here is quite “tight” and may need some fine-tuning.

Circuit description is quite a mouthful…

“Ultrapath choke-loaded driver stage, direct reactance/’Free Lunched’, direct-coupled to output tube which is ‘Monkeyed’, ‘Ultrapathed’ and ‘Parafed’.”

Phew! Note that Ultrapath or Parafeed is of course, optional.

Most direct-coupled circuits commit suicide when the input tube goes bust, resulting in extensive damage to output tube and in some cases, even to power transformers. If you “forgot” to put a fuse in your amp, it might even bring down your house. Now your Monkey is a BIG MEAN KING KONG.

This Monkey Darling is safe though due to it’s “Monkey” design.

That said, bass performance might suffer due to insufficient loading on driver tube. Shouldn’t be a problem down to 40Hz though… Changing driver tube to lower rp types like 5842 will rectify this. Adjust resistors for 5842 operating points.

Read about “Free Lunch” here.

Read about “Direct Reactance” here

Read why this arrangment is safer than normal direct-coupled amps here.

The post Monkey Darling! appeared first on diyparadise.